Home The Washington Diplomat May 2007

New Passport Requirement Worries U.S. Neighbors

E-mail
Print
Share This Page
Increase Text Size Text Reset Decrease Text Size

A new law that aims to protect the United States from terrorists may inadvertently cost the Caribbean islands hundreds of millions of dollars in lost tourism revenues, while specifically helping Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

That’s the assessment from tourism officials in at least a dozen Caribbean destinations who are concerned about the long-term effects of the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative (WHTI), which will also have a significant impact on Mexico and Canada.

Under WHTI, which took effect Jan. 23, all U.S. citizens re-entering the United States via air—including those returning from Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean—now need valid U.S. passports, when previously a driver’s license was enough. The second phase of the initiative will require passports for all Americans crossing by land into Canada and Mexico by June 1, 2009, at the latest. For now, cruise-ship passengers are exempt from the ruling but will require passports by the June 1, 2009 deadline.

Hugh Riley, marketing director at the Barbados-based Caribbean Tourism Organization (CTO), said that since the new regulations went into effect, news of the passport requirement seems to have reached “large numbers” of prospective travelers.

“Some observers credit the Caribbean’s tourism authorities, a network of Caribbean-producing travel professionals and the media for giving wide coverage of the issue,” said Riley. “A number of popular winter destinations which are not affected by the passport requirement like Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands and South Florida do not appear at this early stage to be seeing any big boost in tourist arrivals.”

He added: “The cruise industry, which is also unaffected by the immediate need for cruise passengers to have a passport, is widely reported to be having a soft season.

“There is, however, a backlog of passport applications, leading to an extended waiting period to obtain a U.S. passport. This could be a result of consumers not planning early enough for their vacations and then finding out that a passport is required. Undoubtedly, this will have an adverse effect on travel to the Caribbean if prospective vacationers have to delay their trips or choose alternate destinations.”

The Bahamas Ministry of Tourism says WHTI will cost the country 233,000 visitors and 8 million in visitor revenues in 2007 alone. According to a study commissioned by the Puerto Rico-based Caribbean Hotel Association (CHA), some 86.6 percent of all visitors to the Bahamas are U.S. citizens—the highest percentage of any country in the Caribbean, and even higher than the proportion of U.S. citizens traveling to Puerto Rico (86.1 percent) and the U.S. Virgin Islands (85.4 percent).

“On the surface, this decision may be seen as yet another valid security enhancement to protect U.S. borders. However, it does impose a significant economic hardship for several Caribbean economies, which depend heavily on U.S. visitors,” said CTO. “This movement in traffic and need to get U.S. visitors to apply for passports is not a temporary situation. Instead, it is a permanent change in traffic and market potential for Caribbean destinations that have previously enjoyed a freer flow and larger potential market of U.S. visitors.”

The State Department estimates that only 27 percent of Americans currently have passports. And some people might be dissuaded by the hassle and expense of applying for a passport, which now costs ( for children under 16). That doesn’t include the execution fee or photo fee.

Indeed, that’s exactly what Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands are banking on. Passports aren’t necessary to visit either destination—a fact both territories are touting in their latest ad campaigns.

“Today’s travelers are looking for convenient and hassle-free vacations that allow them to escape from their hectic daily lives,” said Terestella González Denton, executive director of the Puerto Rico Tourism Co. (PRTC). “Puerto Rico’s exemption from the new passport regulation allows travelers to easily pack up, leave their hometowns, and explore our beautiful island.”

To persuade tourists to do just that, the PRTC is spending million on its latest advertising blitz, which features the slogan: “Leave your passport at home—travel to Puerto Rico now!”

Similar tactics are being pursued by the U.S. Virgin Islands Hotel and Tourism Association, which has created “No Passports Required” promotions, including substantial discounts on tour packages.

According to the Virgin Islands Daily News, the territory’s Department of Tourism didn’t begin mentioning the passport exemption in its paid advertising until late January. That’s partially because until October, former Tourism Commissioner Pamela Richards had been locked in a regional dilemma when she served as chairwoman of CTO, which lobbied hard against the new passport requirements.

Caribbean tourism officials say the new passport law could jeopardize as much as .6 billion in tourism revenue and 188,000 jobs throughout the region, particularly when it comes to last-minute travel or budget-conscious Americans.

Yet the WHTI won’t have much impact on destinations such as Martinique or Cuba, which get relatively few American tourists—or other islands such as Anguilla, Curaçao or the Turks and Caicos, where the Americans who do visit already have passports.

“Thus far, this has not been an issue for us, as most of our visitors are high-end seasoned travelers who hold passports,” said Caesar Campbell, executive director of the Turks and Caicos Hotel and Tourism Association.

“Aruba is very happy to report that the island has not seen any negative fallout” from WHTI, added Cristina Rivas, associate vice president at Quinn and Co., the New York-based public relations firm that holds the Aruba tourism account.

“We conducted a Q-and-A with the island’s travel partners to gauge how business was impacted and heard across the board that Aruba was doing just fine despite the new travel initiative,” she said. “In fact, we heard in some cases, cancellations were down in the first two months of 2007 and that business to Aruba had seen year-over-year growth.”

At the other end of the spectrum is Jamaica, which could suffer a double whammy because 73 percent of its foreign tourists are Americans, 80 percent of whom don’t have passports.

To combat that effect, the Jamaica Tourist Board has launched a program encouraging U.S. citizens to get their passports by rewarding vacationers who make Jamaica their first visit with their new passport. These include special credits while on the island equivalent to the cost of obtaining a passport.

Other destinations in trouble, according to CHA, are the Cayman Islands, where an estimated 40.5 percent of arrivals could be affected; the British Virgin Islands (32.2 percent); the Bahamas (21.7 percent); and St. Kitts and Nevis (20.4 percent).

Canada has also lobbied hard against the WHTI, which will require passports for all Americans crossing by land into Canada and Mexico by June 1, 2009.

Michael Wilson, Canada’s ambassador to the United States, said he agrees that security is of great importance, but he’s concerned that WHTI will interrupt legitimate commerce and travel.

At least 70 percent of the class="import-text">2007May.U.S Neighbors.txt.6 billion in U.S.-Canadian trade is transported over the border by trucks, which translates into more than class="import-text">2007May.U.S Neighbors.txt million per minute. That trade could be significantly slowed down if truckers must apply for passports and present them each time they cross the long border between the two countries.

“First, we need transparent Canada-U.S. consultations to plan out how WHTI will be implemented at our joint land border. Second, we need to consider whether we can use commonly held documents as alternatives to a passport. Since the vast majority of travelers are welcome visitors, let’s do this in a user-friendly manner,” said Wilson.

“Third, we need a robust economic impact analysis to be completed on the WHTI land border implementation that maps out the economic consequences for U.S. travel and tourist industries, particularly in the implementation phase. Finally, we need a comprehensive and well-planned communication, marketing and distribution plan to explain WHTI requirements to our stakeholders and again, do so in a user-friendly way.”

About the Author

Larry Luxner is a contributing writer for The Washington Diplomat.

Last Edited on November 29, 1999